A row counter for hand knitting is a tally counter used for counting rows or courses worked, for counting stitch pattern repetitions, or for counting increases or decreases in the number of stitches across consecutive rows. The first commercially produced row counter appeared on the market in the 1920s, after the general public started regularly knitting from unfamiliar printed and complex patterns. Design variations include on-needle barrel-shaped counters for straight-needle work and stitch-marker counters for knitting on double-pointed and circular needles.
Facts
Introduced When (Circa) Introduced era (class) FAQs
Why did commercially produced row counters first appear in the 1920s?
The public had begun knitting from unfamiliar, complex printed patterns, making an accurate row count more important.
The first commercially produced row counter for hand knitting appeared on the market in the United Kingdom in 1920, after the general public started regularly knitting from unfamiliar printed and complex patterns that made keeping an accurate row count more important.
Connections
Used In
Source Thread and Maple: Glossary of Knitting Terms
In the Other Atlases
Era Of Origin
Also in History Atlas: the era this subject comes from.
Also in History Atlas: the era this subject comes from.
Sources
1. Row counter (hand knitting) (Wikipedia)
History section, first sentence
appeared on the market in the 1920s
History section, second sentence
appeared in the UK
View the SourceThread and Maple: Glossary of Knitting Terms
Thread and MapleUsed In: Knitting, Glossary
A stitch counter, also known as a row counter, is a precision tool used in knitting and crochet to accurately track the number of stitches or rows completed during a project.
In Group: Knitting Tools and Knitting Machines, Glossary
A stitch counter, also known as a row counter, is a precision tool used in knitting and crochet to accurately track the number of stitches or rows completed during a project.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.